This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Jordan, R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Jordan, R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Evaluating Practice

Problems and Possibilities

University of Birmingham, UK

This article seeks to examine some of the issues involved in the evaluation of practice by practitioners themselves. Five questions are posed which represent five different kinds of design suitable for the different purposes of evaluation in each case. For each question, an analysis is made of the problem that the question is addressing, an example is given of the design needed to answer that question, and a further analysis is made of the possible outcomes of the evaluation, suggesting how they may be interpreted. Finally, there is a brief discussion of the issues involved in controlled studies, the ethical issues that arise in research and how participants with autism spectrum disorders may themselves by involved in evaluation. The article makes the point that research should not be an activity carried out by others, using natural settings merely as sources of data, but a process that all practitioners are engaged in at some level. In this way, progress can be made in improving services and the quality of life for people with autism spectrum disorders.

Key Words: autistic spectrum disorders • ethics • evaluation • naturalistic research design • practice

Autism, Vol. 3, No. 4, 411-434 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1362361399003004008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?