Autism

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowler, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Thommen, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bowler, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Thommen, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Autism, Vol. 4, No. 2, 147-171 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1362361300004002004

Attribution of Mechanical and Social Causality to Animated Displays by Children with Autism

Dermot M. Bowler

City University, UK

Evelyne Thommen

Université de Fribourg, Switzerland

Two studies are reported that compare the descriptions given by children with and without autism of animated stimuli depicting mechanical launching effects, intentional reactions or sequences of mechanical and intentional reactions. Children were matched on chronological age, verbal mental age and IQ. The children with autism were as able as the control groups at differentiating mechanical launches from intentional reactions. Moreover, their descriptions of the longer action sequence were significantly different neither in length nor in their use of mental state language from those of the controls. However, finer-grained analyses of the accounts showed that the children with autism involved themselves more in the narrative than did control children. They also made less reference to episodes showing actions between animate objects, especially when the objects were not in contact. The implications of these findings for theories of autistic social dysfunction are discussed.

Key Words: animation • autism • causality


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. S. Heberlein and R. Adolphs
Impaired spontaneous anthropomorphizing despite intact perception and social knowledge
PNAS, May 11, 2004; 101(19): 7487 - 7491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AutismHome page
L. Binnie and J. Williams
Intuitive Psychology and Physics among Children with Autism and Typically Developing Children
Autism, June 1, 2003; 7(2): 173 - 193.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
F. Castelli, C. Frith, F. Happe, and U. Frith
Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes
Brain, August 1, 2002; 125(8): 1839 - 1849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]